关于dynamicsto的信息

请教英语语法

1. that在这里是形容词修饰whispered message that一般有指示远处事物的功能 相当于中文里的"那" 在这里即指 “那种低声耳语” 这里用the代替是可以的 但是没有that这么好 用it则不行 因为它不是形容词不能放在名词前做定语 同时它也不是冠词

翁牛特ssl适用于网站、小程序/APP、API接口等需要进行数据传输应用场景，ssl证书未来市场广阔！成为创新互联的ssl证书销售渠道，可以享受市场价格4-6折优惠！如果有意向欢迎电话联系或者加微信：13518219792（备注：SSL证书合作）期待与您的合作！

2. when引导的是时间状语从句 表示"当....的时候"

1. in which引导的是非限制性定语从句 which指代the social cure in which 即指代in the social

cure在从句 中做地点状语

(从句相当于in the social cure organizations and officials use the power of group dynamics to

help individuals improve their lives and possibly the world)

2. improve their lives这里是不定式(省略to)做宾语补足语 补充说明help的宾语individuals

目的状语是表目的，作用范围是动作或者整个句子

宾补是对宾语起补充作用, 作用范围是宾语这个名词

比如 I have to give her money to make her happy 中 to make her happy是目的状语 作用范围

是give her money这个动作或者说整个句子I have to give her money

贺金生的代表论著

Jing X, Sanders NJ, Shi Y, Chu HY, Classen AT, Zhao K, Chen LT, Jiang YX, He J-S* 2015.The links between ecosystem multifunctionality and above- and belowground biodiversity are mediated by climate.Nature Communications6: 8159.

Song WM, Wang H, Wang GS, Chen LT, Jin ZN, Zhuang QL, He J-S*. 2015.Methane emissions from an alpine wetland on the Tibetan Plateau: Neglected but vital contribution of non-growing season.Journal of Geophysical Research-Biogeosciences: doi:10.1002/2015JG003043.

Jin ZN, Zhuang QL, He J-S, Zhu XD, Song WM 2015.Net exchanges of methane and carbon dioxide on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau from 1979 to 2100.Environmental Research Letters: doi:10.1088/1748-9326/10/8/085007.

Niu KC, He J-S, Zhang ST, Lechowicz MJ 2015.Grazing increases functional richness but not functional divergence in Tibetan alpine meadow plant communities.Biodiversity and Conservation: doi: 10.1007/s10531-015-0960-2.

Chen LT, Flynn DFB, Zhang XW, Gao XL, Lin L, Luo J, Zhao CM* 2015.Divergent patterns of foliar δ13C and δ15N in Quercus aquifolioides with an altitudinal transect on the Tibetan Plateau: an integrated study based on multiple key leaf functional traits.Journal of Plant Ecology8: 303-312.

Chen LT, Flynn DFB, Jing X, Kühn P, Scholten T, He J-S 2015.A comparison of two methods for quantifying soil organic carbon of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau.PLoS ONE10: e0126372.

Mi ZR, Huang YY, Gan HJ,Zhou WJ, Flynn DFB, He J-S* 2015.Leaf P increase outpaces leaf N in an Inner Mongolia grassland over 27 years. Biology Letters 11: 20140981.

Ding S, Xu Y, Wang Y, He Y,Hou J, Chen L,He J-S 2015.Distributions of glycerol dialkyl glycerol tetraethers in surface soils ofQinghai–Tibetan Plateau: implications of GDGT-based proxies in cold and dryregions. Biogeosciences Discussion 12: 481-513.

Zhang ZJ,Yan YJ,Tian Y, LiJS, He J-S, Tang ZY* 2015.Distribution and conservation of orchid species richness in China. Biological Conservation 181: 64-72.

Eichenberg D, Trogisch S,Huang YY, He J-S, Bruelheide H 2014.Shifts in community leaf functional traits are related to litter decompositionalong a secondary forest succession series in subtropical China. Journal of Plant Ecology DOI:10.1093/jpe/rtu021: .

Wang YH, Liu HY, Chung H,Yu LF, Mi ZR, Geng Y, Jing X, Wang SP, Zeng H, Cao GM, Zhao XQ, He J-S* 2014. Non-growing-season soilrespiration is controlled by freezing and thawing processes in the summermonsoon-dominated Tibetan alpine grassland. Global Biogeochemical Cycles28: 1081-1095.

Yang XX, Yang Y, Ji CJ,Feng T, Shi Y, Lin L, Ma JJ, He J-S*2014. Large-scale patterns of stomatal traits in Tibetan and Mongoliangrassland species. Basic and Applied Ecology 15: 122-132.

Shi Y, Wang YH, Ma YL, MaWH, Liang CZ, Flynn DFB, Schmid B, Fang JY, He J-S* 2014. Field-based observations of regional-scale, temporalvariation in net primary production in Tibetan alpine grasslands. Biogeosciences11: 2003-2016.

Baumann F*, Schmidt K,Dörfer C, He J-S, Scholten T, Kühn P2014. Pedogenesis, permafrost, substrate and topography: Plot and landscapescale interrelations of weathering processes on the central-eastern TibetanPlateau. Geoderma 226-227: 300-316.

Geng Y, Wang L, Jin DM, LiuHY, He J-S* 2014. Alpine climatealters the relationships between leaf and root morphological traits but notchemical traits. Oecologia 175: 445-455.

Jing X, Wang YH, Chung H,Mi ZR, Wang SP, Zeng H, He J-S*2014. No temperature acclimation of soil extracellular enzymes to experimentalwarming in an alpine grassland ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau. Biogeochemistry117: 39-54.

Chen LT, Niu KC, Wu Y, GengY, Mi ZR, Flynn DFB, He J-S* 2013.UV radiation is the primary factor driving the variation in leaf phenolicsacross Chinese grasslands. Ecology and Evolution 3: 4696-4710.

Jin DM, Ma JJ, Ma WH, LiangCZ, Shi Y andHe J-S* 2013. Legumesin Chinese natural grasslands: Species, biomass, and distribution. Rangeland Ecology Management 66: 648-656.

Du EZ, Zhou Z, Li P, Hu XY,Ma YC, Wang W, Zheng CY, Zhu JX, He J-S,Fang JY* 2013. NEECF: a project of nutrient enrichment experiments in China’sforests. Journal of Plant Ecology 6: 428-435.

HeJ-S*,Muraoka H, Son Y, Fang JY 2013. Carbon patterns and processes in East Asianecosystems: multi-scale approaches (Editorial). Journal of Plant Ecology6: 323-324.

Ma YL, Geng Y, Huang YY,Shi Y, Niklaus P, Schmid B, He J-S*2013. Effect of clear-cutting silviculture on soil respiration in a subtropicalforest of China. Journal of Plant Ecology 6: 335-348.

Yu LF, Wang H, Wang GS,Song WM, Huang Y, Li S-G, Liang NS, Tang YH, He J-S* 2013. A comparison of methane emission measurements usingeddy covariance and manual and automated chamber-based techniques in TibetanPlateau alpine wetland. Environmental Pollution 181: 81-90.

Liu C, Wang XP, Wu X, DaiS, He J-S, Yin WL* 2013. Relativeeffects of phylogeny, biological characters and environments on leaf traits inshrub biomes across central Inner Mongolia, China. Journal of Plant Ecology 6: 220-231.

Jin ZN*, Zhuang QL, He J-S, Luo TX, Shi Y 2013. Phenologyshift from 1989 to 2008 on the Tibetan Plateau: an analysis with aprocess-based soil physical model and remote sensing data. Climatic Change 119: 435-449.

Shi Y, Ma YL, Ma WH, LiangCZ, Zhao XQ, Fang JY, He J-S* 2013.Large scale patterns of forage yield and quality across Chinese grasslands. Chinese Science Bulletin 58: 1187-1199.

Dorfer C*,Kuhn P,Baumann F,He J-S,Scholten T 2013. Soil organiccarbon pools and stocks in permafrost-affected soils on the Tibetan Plateau. PLoS ONE 8: e57024.

Huang N*,He J-S, Niu Z 2013. Estimating thespatial pattern of soil respiration in Tibetan alpine grasslands using LandsatTM images and MODIS data. Ecological Indicators 26: 117-125.

HeJ-S 2012.Carbon cycling of Chinese forests: From carbon storage, dynamics to models. Science China Life Science 55: 188-190.

Geng Y, Wang ZH, Liang CZ,Fang JY, Frank B, Kühn P, Scholten T, HeJ-S* 2012. Effect of geographical range size on plant functional traits andthe relationships between plant, soil and climate in Chinese grasslands. Global Ecology and Biogeography 21: 416–427.

Shi Y, Baumann F, Ma YL,Song C, Kuehn P, Scholten T, He J-S*.2012. Organic and inorganic carbon in the topsoil of the Mongolian and Tibetangrasslands: pattern, control and implications. Biogeosciences 9:2287–2299.

Geng Y,Wang YH,Yang K,WangSP,Zeng H,Baumann F, Kuehn P, Scholten T, HeJ-S* 2012. Soil Respiration in Tibetan Alpine Grasslands: BelowgroundBiomass and Soil Moisture, but Not Soil Temperature, Best Explain theLarge-Scale Patterns. PLoS ONE 7: e34968.

Ma JJ, Ji CJ, Han M, ZhangTF, Yan XD, Hu D, Zeng H, He J-S*2012. Comparative analyses of leaf anatomical characteristics of dicotyledonousspecies in Tibetan and Inner Mongolian grasslands. Science China Life Sciences 42: 158-172.

Tao S*, Wang WT, Liu WX,Zuo Q, Wang XL, Wang R, Wang B, Shen GF, Yang YH, He J-S 2011. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and organochlorinepesticides in surface soils from the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 13: 175–181.

Chu ZY, Lu YJ, Chang J*,Wang M, Jiang H, He J-S, Peng CH*,Ge Y 2011. Leaf respiration/photosynthesis relationship and variation: aninvestigation of 39 woody and herbaceous species in east subtropical China. Trees-Structureand Function 25: 301-310.

Ma WH, He J-S*, Yang YH, Wang XP, Liang CZ, Anwar M, Zeng H, Fang JY,Schmid B 2010. Environmental factors co-vary with plant diversity-productivityrelationships among Chinese grassland sites. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19: 233–243.

HeJ-S*, WangX, Schmid B, Flynn DFB, Li XF, Reich PB, Fang JY 2010. Taxonomic identity,phylogeny, climate and soil fertility as drivers of leaf traits across Chinesegrassland biomes. Journal of Plant Research 123: 551-561.

Ma WH, Liu ZL, Wang ZH,Wang W, Liang CZ, Tang YH,He J-S,Fang JY* 2010. Climate change alters interannual variation of grasslandaboveground productivity: evidence from a 22-year measurement series in theInner Mongolian grassland. Journal of Plant Research 123:509-517.

Baumann F, He J-S,Schmidt K, Kühn P, Scholten T. 2009. Pedogenesis, permafrost, and soil moistureas controlling factors for soil nitrogen and carbon contents across the TibetanPlateau. Global Change Biology 15: 3001–3017

Yang YH, Fang JY, Smith P,Tang YH, Chen AP, Ji CJ, Hu HF, Rao S, Tan K, He J-S. 2009. Changes intopsoil carbon stock in the Tibetan grasslands between the 1980s and 2004. Global Change Biology 15: 2723–2729

He J-S, Wang XP, Flynn DF, WangL, Schmid B, Fang JY. 2009. Taxonomic, phylogenetic and environmental tradeoffsbetween leaf productivity and persistence.Ecology 90: 2779-2791

He J-S, Wang L, Flynn DFB, WangX, Ma W, Fang J. 2008. Leaf nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinesegrassland biomes. Oecologia155, 301-310

He J-S, Fang JY, Wang ZH, Guo DL,Flynn DFB, Geng Z. 2006. Stoichiometry and large-scale patterns of leaf carbonand nitrogen in the grassland biomes of China. Oecologia, 149:115-122

He J-S, Wang ZH, Wang XP, SchmidB, Zuo W, Zhou M, Zheng CY, Wang MF, Fang JY, 2006. A test of the generality ofleaf trait relationships on the Tibetan Plateau. New Phytologist, 170: 835-848

Balvanera P, Pfisterer AB,Buchmann N, He J-S, Nakashizuka T, Raffaelli D, Schmid B. 2006.Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning andservices. Ecology Letters, 99:1146–1156

He J-S, Flynn DFB, Wolfe-BellinK, Fang J, Bazzaz FA. 2005. CO2 and nitrogen, but not populationdensity, alter the size and C/N ratio ofPhytolacca americana seeds. Functional Ecology, 19: 437-444

He J-S, Wolfe-Bellin KS, SchmidB, Bazzaz FA. 2005. Density may alter diversity-productivity relationships inexperimental plant communities. Basicand Applied Ecology, 6: 505-517

He J-S, Wolfe-Bellin KS, BazzazFA. 2005. Leaf-level physiology, biomass, and reproduction of Phytolaccaamericana under conditions of elevated CO2 and alteredtemperature regimes. International Journal of Plant Sciences, 166: 615-622

He J-S, Bazzaz FA. 2003.Density-dependent responses of reproductive allocation to elevated atmosphericCO2 in Phytolacca americana. New Phytologist, 157: 229-239

He J-S, Bazzaz FA, Schmid B.2002. Interactive effects of diversity, nutrients and elevated CO2on experimental plant communities. Oikos,97: 337-348

80台上榜HIFI收音头(配图)

80台上榜HIFI收音头(配图)

在著名的收音头权威网站Tuner Information

Center，从2002年9月至2006年2月，高保真音响系统评估小组成员吉姆以一对一打擂台的形式，对许多顶级收音头的声音进行了系统的评估(原文：From

September 2002 to February 2006, audiophile panelist Jim systematically

evaluated the sound of many top tuners ， in side-by-side shootouts)，结果如下：

;tid=1979007extra=page=1page=1

上图受限，先发个规格表，是别人整理出来的。 收 音 头型 号

灵敏度 /dBf 选择性 / dB 俘获比 / dB 失真(STHD)% 信噪比 / dB 立体声分离度 / dB 30 dB 50 dB Mono

Stereo Accupha T-108 11.0 17.0 100 1.5 0.02 0.02 90 80 Denon TU-850 9.8 15.5 65

84 60 Kenwood KT-7500 9.8 14.1 100 1.0 0.10 0.30 75 50 Kenwood L-07T 9.3 14.2

100 1.0 0.15 0.50 80 45 Kenwood L-1000T 10.8 16.2 73 1.0 0.008 71 MagnumD FT-101

10.2 13.2 60 MagnumD FT-101A 10.3 13.2 80 1.5 0.10 0.18 75 60 MagnumD MD-108 9.0

9.9 60 1.5 50 Mcintos MR-78 13.0 90 2.5 0.20 0.20 75 40 Mcintos MR-80 9.3 14.7

110 1.5 0.08 0.08 75 50 Pioneer TX-9500II 8.8 13.2 85 0.8 0.07 0.25 82 50

Pioneer TX-9800 8.8 13.2 85 0.8 0.07 0.07 83 55 Sansui TU-717 9.8 12.5 80 1.0

0.07 0.20 81 48 Sansui TU-919 9.0 12.5 85 1.5 80 70 Sansui TU-X1 8.7 12.5 85 0.9

0.03 0.03 86 50 Sony ST-J88B 10.3 15.3 65 1.0 0.07 0.30 80 50 Tandber TPT-3011A

9.8 65 100 50 Yamaha T-2 8.8 13.2 100 1.0 0.05 0.15 88 55

世纪调频广播的辉煌历史为调谐器收藏家留下了一笔丰盛的遗产，当年全世界有六十五家电子企业共生产了两千多种型号的调谐器，其中最著名的18种调谐器见表1。

表1：历史上最著名的18种调谐器 生产厂商 型号 发布时间 SAE SAE Mark Six 1971 Yamaha CT7000 1974 Sony

ST5555 1974 Sherwood Micro/CPU100 1977 Revox B760 1978 Toshiba ST910 1978

McIntosh MR80 1980 Revox B261 1982 Kenwood L-02T 1982 Tandberg 3001A 1983

Accuphase T-106 1984 Naim NAT 01 1985 Revox B260S 1989 Meridian Model 504 1993

Fanfare FT-1 1993 Rotel RHT10 1993 Linn Kudos 1995 Marantz Dynalab MD-108 1996

注：FTA-100和MD-109是本世纪的产品，故没有列入。 以下是当时的价目 1963: Mcintosh MR-67 ($299) 1964:

Marantz 10/10B ($650) 1967: Sony ST-5000W ($399). 1970: Marantz 20 ($695) 1971:

Marantz 20B (695) SAE Mark VI ($1050) 1972: Mac MR78 ($1699) 1973: Sequerra

Model 1 ($3000) Accuphase T-100 ($750) 1974: Yamaha CT-7000 ($1200) SAE VIB

($1250) Technics ST-9700 Sansui TU-9900 ($570) 1975: Luxman T-110 ($525) 1976:

Kenwood 600T ($600) 1977: Luxman T-12 ($645) Luxman 5T50 ($1495) Sherwood

Micro/CPU ($2000) Philips AH-673 ($600) 1978: Yamaha T-2 ($750) Luxman 5T10

($795) Onkyo T-909 ($900) Revox B-760 ($1650) Toshiba ST-910 ($1800) 1979:

Pioneer F-26 ($1000) Sansui TU-919 ($585) 1980: Sansui TU-X1 ($980) Kenwood

KT-917 ($1000) Kenwood L-01T (????) Mac MR-80 ($2499) Tandberg 3001 ($1,095)

1981: Sony ST-J88B ($900) 1982: Kenwood L-02T ($1800/3000) Revox B261 ($1500)

1984: Onkyo T-9090, ($700) 1986: Yamaha T-85 ($449/500) 1988: Tandberg 3001A

($2,200) Onkyo T-9090II ($790) Yamaha TX-1000/2000 ($550/750) 1991: Kenwood

L-1000T ($1100) 1993: Rotel RHT-10 ($1,499)

以下是3台名妓的比较 magnum MD-108--Mclntosh MR-8--Trio L-02T

灵敏度-----100------------82-----------85 真实性-----100------------85-----------87

现场气氛---100-----------88-----------80 感染力------100-----------90-----------85

动态--------100------------85-----------85

瞬变--------100------------82-----------90 透明度------95------------85-----------88

空气感------100-----------90-----------87 厚度--------100------------95-----------86

韵味---------95------------92-----------86

频应---------95------------85-----------90 节奏感-------95-----------85-----------90

控制力------100-----------85-----------87 定位--------100------------85-----------90

音场--------100------------85-----------85 立体空间----100-----------83-----------88

音色甜润-----95-----------95------------86

1 PLUS: -C- Accuphase T-109V - Very natural sound, good bass. Pinpoint

imaging. Lifelike, three-dimensional sound, smooth extended highs

1加，金嗓子T-109V：非常自然的声音，低音很劲，精确的成像，逼真的三维声场，高频延 伸非常润滑。

1: -C- Kenwood L-02T - Most natural sound, good bass. Pinpoint imaging.

Lifelike, three-dimensional sound.

1 建伍的L-02T，最最真实自然的声音，低频劲，结像非常精确，逼真的三维声场。

2: -C- Sansui TU-919 - The prince who could be king.

2 山水的TU-919，最有希望成为帝王的王子。

3: -C- Sansui TU-X1 - Very good sound top to bottom. Big soundstage, three-

dimensional. Very slight diffuse sound.

3 山水的TU-X1，全频段的声音表现都很好，非常宽的三维声场，但是有轻微的漫射声。

4: -C- Audiolab 8000T - Good bass, natural but diffuse sound, sweet

extended highs.

4 AUDIOLAB的8000T，低音劲且自然，但是有些漫射声，高频延伸得很甜。

5: -C- Philips AH6731 - A very natural, neutral sound. Stereo separation

best with a good signal.

5 飞利浦的AH6731 非常非常自然得声音，在较好的接受信号时立体声的分离度无与伦比。

6: -C- Revox B760 - Great bass, lifelike midrange and extended highs.

6 Revox B760，低音很棒，逼真的三维空间，高频延伸很好。

7: -M- Kenwood KT-5020 - Great bass and midrange and extended, sweet

treble. Again, why pay more?

7 建伍的KT5020，巨好的低频和中频延伸，高音甜。超值?

8: -M- Kenwood KT-990D - Smooth, clean sound that always pleased. Why pay

more?

8 建伍的KT-990D，顺滑、干净的声音，让人听上去非常愉悦。超值?

9: -M- Meridian Model 104 - Excellent, natural sound, good bass, no to DX

games.

9 Meridian Model 104，非常优秀自然的声音，低频表现好，但不适合玩远程。

10: -M- Meridian Model 504 - Good bass, excellent midrange with smooth,

just- right highs.

10 Meridian Model 504，低音表现出色，中频表现非常出色，而且更为顺滑。

11: -M- Kenwood L-1000T - Good bass, punchy midrange, sweet extended

highs.

11 建伍的L-1000T，低音劲，中频突出，高频延伸得很甜。

12: -M- Sansui TU-X701 - Great-sounding midrange, bass OK, softer highs

next to the L-02T.

12 山水的TU-X701，中频非常通透，低音也很好，高音甚至比L-02T更软更甜。

13: -M- Luxman T-117 - Very good-sounding tuner. No real faults, top to

bottom. Not as three-dimensional as the L-02T and gives up some bass

richness.

13 力士的T-117，非常好声的收音头，从高频到低频几乎没有缺憾，三维声场不如建伍的 L-02T，而且也放弃了一些低频的浓郁度。

14: -M- Sansui TU-717 - Good bass and midrange with nice "depth" to the

soundstage. More forward than the L-02T.

14 山水的TU-717，低频劲，中频饱满而富有漂亮的“深度”，可以表现较好的声场，其风 格更加倾向于建伍的L-02T。

15: -M- BK TS-108 - Very nice midrange, good bass and nice, extended

highs. 15 BK TS-108，非常华丽的中频，低音劲，高音延伸好。

16: -M- Technics ST-9038 - Very good bass, nice midrange, smooth

treble.

16 松下的ST-9038，低频劲暴，中频准确，高频甜滑。 17: -M- Magnum Dynalab MD-108 - Bass OK, very

good imaging and realistic midrange, extended but forward highs.

17 密林的MD108，低音好，非常好的结像度，真实的中频，高音延伸好但是就是有点前 冲。 18: -M- Kenwood KT-917 - Good

bass, midrange and treble. A very pleasant sound but more one-dimensional when

placed next to the L-02T.

18 建伍的KT-917，高中低频表现都很好，听感让人愉悦，但是和L02T比较三维就不突出 了，好像变成了单维。

19: -M- Sansui TU-S9 - Smooth, natural sound. A budget bargain.

19 山水的TU-S9，甜滑自然的声音，而且价廉。

20: -M- Kenwood KT-1100 - Quite tuneful, but flatter soundstage than the

L-02T.

20 建伍的KT-1100，音调十分的谐美，但是和L-02T比声场方面就显得有些扁平了。

21: -M- McIntosh MR 80 - Good bass, lively midrange and pleasant highs.

More one-dimensional than the L-02T.

21 麦景图的MR80，低音好，中音活泼，高音让人愉悦，和建伍的L-02T比，三维感就比较 单一了。

22: -M- Sanyo Plus T35 - Good bass, laidback midrange and extended,

pleasant highs.

22 三洋的T35，低音好，中音有些散，高音让人愉悦。

23: -M- Technics ST-G7 - Very nice bass, articulate midrange, forward but

nice upper range.

23 松下的ST-G7，低音非常好，中频清晰，有点前冲，但是高音华丽。 24: -M- Pioneer F-99X - Follows behind

the big bass dogs but the midrange and treble are where it's at. Sweet, clean,

quiet and to be copied. 24 先锋的F-99X， 跟随着大低音狗(不解，??)但是中高音还是甜美干净安静。

25: -M- Kenwood KT-3300D - Very good bass, slightly diffuse light mids and

pleasant extended highs. A laidback, nice listen.

25 建伍的KT3300D，低音好，中音有些轻微的漫射声，高音延伸得很好，让人愉悦，松散 得声音听感很好。 26: -M- Pioneer F-90

- Great sonics with a slightly lighter sonic presentation than the top dogs.

Upper midrange and treble are top-notch.

26先锋得F-90，非常好声的机器，声音有些偏亮，中音的上限和高音的衔接不是很好，有 缺口。

27: -M- Sansui TU-D99X - Good bass. Bass, midrange and treble work well

together for a balanced sound. 27 山水的TU-D99X，高中低表现的很好，非常平衡的一台机器。

28: -M- Sony ST-J88B - Good bass, pleasing midrange, slightly forward and

sweet treble.

28 索尼的ST-J88B 低音好，中频很讨人喜欢，高音甜但是前冲。

29: -M- Restek Metric - Excellent imaging, bass and highs. Midrange gave up

some to other tuners.

29 Restek Metric 优秀的结像和高低频。相对于其他的收音头中频有些损失。

30: -M- Perreaux TU-3 - Nice balanced sound. Gives up some richness and

dynamics to the L-02T.

30 Perreaux TU-3 平衡度很好，相对于建伍的L-02T损失了一些细节和动态。 31: -M- Magnum Dynalab FT-101

- Good all-around sound, treble very slightly forward.

31 密林的FT-101 全频表现很好，高音有些前冲。

32: -M- Kenwood L-07TII - Good all-around sound but loses some inner

detail.

32 建伍的L-07T II，全频表现很好，但是缺乏一些内在细节。

33: -M- Accuphase T-109 - Great bass, dry midrange, pleasant but slightly

forward treble.

33 金嗓子的T-109 低音好，中频有些干，高音很讨人喜欢但是有些前冲。 34: -M- Magnum Dynalab FT-101A Etude

- A good, balanced sound, but slightly dry.

34 密林的FT101A练习曲，很平衡的声音，略微有些干。 35: -M- Technics ST-8077 - Good bass,

midrange OK. Nice treble presentation.

35 松下的ST-8077，低频好，中频也不错，高音很华丽。 36: -M- Technics ST-8080 - Good bass, good

midrange, forward highs but not unpleasant.

36 松下的ST-8080，中、低音都很好，高频有些前冲但也不讨人嫌。

37: -M- Nikko Gamma V - Very good bass, good imaging, treble forward but

not unpleasant.

37 日光伽马V(没听过这牌子)，低音很好，很好的结像度，高频前倾但不讨人嫌。

38: -M- Kenwood KT-8300 - Good bass and dynamics, with a slightly forward

upper midrange and treble.

38 建伍的KT8300，低音好且富有动态，中频上限和高频略微有些前冲。

39: -M- Onkyo T-4500 - Slightly lighter but a pleasing sound. Neutral, top

to bottom, with nice highs.

39 安桥的T-4500 有些亮但还是让人愉悦的声音，从头到尾都很自然，高音甜美。

40: -M- Onkyo T-9090II - Pleasant sound, good bass, but not as dynamic as

some tuners. Great DX machine.

40 安桥的T-9090 II 令人愉悦的声音，低频好，但是动态不如其他一些收音头，但是远程 接收是大大的好!!

41: -M- NAD 4155 - Good, punchy bass. Light, articulate mids with

well-mated highs.

41 NAD 4155 强有力的低频，亮而清晰的中频和高频相得益彰。

42: -M- Pioneer F-91 - Very good bass punch and control, articulate

midrange with forward highs. May be a good tuner for a large room.

42 先锋的F-91 强有力的低频而且控制力好，清晰的中频，高音前倾，但对大房间来说可 能是台不错的收音头哦!

43: -M- Pioneer TX-9800 - Rich bass presentation. Good midrange with a

treble slightly forward that took away from the total picture.

43 先锋的TX-9800，丰富的低频，漂亮的中频，高音有些前冲好像从整幅画面中突出来一 样。

44: -M- Tandberg 3011A - Good bass, midrange a little light, sweet treble.

Very good imaging. 44 TANDBERG 3011A ，低频好，中频有些亮，高音甜，成像很好。

45: -M- Sansui TU-417 - A most pleasant sound, bottom to top. Needs good

signals.

45 山水的TU-417 彻头彻尾是最令人愉悦的声音，前提必须要好的信号。

46: -M- Carver TX-11b - Punchy bass, clean highs and treble.

46 卡佛(没听过)TX-11B，强劲的低音，干净的高音。

47: -M- Sumo Charlie - Punchy bass, good midrange, slightly rolled-off

treble. Sumo Charlie 强劲的低音，很好的中频，高频略微有些收敛。

48: -M- Revox B260 - Rich bass and lower midrange. Good imaging. Three-

dimensional. The highs are a little too much for my personal taste. The high

rating reflects its other positive sound qualities.

48 Revox B260 丰富的低音，中频有些衰减，很好的结像度，三维突出，高音有些太讨好 我个人的口味了，高级别的反应了它正确的声音质量。

49: -M- Yamaha CT-7000 - Warm-sounding bass, pleasant midrange and highs.

Highs a little rolled-off.

49 雅马哈的CT-7000 温暖的低频，令人愉悦的中高频，高频有些收敛。

50: -M- Sequerra Model 1 - Harmonically rich bass and lower midrange. Very

seductive, but if you want accuracy, shop elsewhere.

50 Sequerra Model 1 和谐而丰富的低频，较低的中频，非常诱人，如果你想要更好的精 确度，你还是另谋好机吧。

51: -M- Magnum Dynalab FT-11 "NEW" - Good sound, natural midrange, treble

nice, loose bass.

51 密林的FT-11新版，好声机，自然的中频，华丽的高频，松散慵懒的低频。

52: -M- Onkyo T-4310R - Pleasant, inoffensive sound, good imaging. Good

digital DXing tuner.

52 安桥的T-4310R 愉悦而不讨人嫌的声音表现，结像度好，非常好的数调远程接受机。

53. -M- Magnum Dynalab FT-101A - Pleasant light, airy sound. Lacks bass

dynamics.

53 密林的FT-101A 轻快愉悦而富有空气感的声音，缺乏低频动态。

54: -M- Realistic TM-1001 - Sweet treble, pleasant mids, but the bass is

not as full and dynamic as the big dogs.

54 Realistic TM-1001 甜美的高音，令人愉快的中频，但是低音和大狗们(比较烧包的机 器)比缺乏全面和动态。

55: -M- Yamaha T-2 - Very pleasant and listenable. This may be the cutoff

tuner between the keepers and the also-rans.

55 雅马哈的T-2，非常令人愉悦和具有可听性，

56: Revox B261 - Punchy bass, pleasant enough but slightly forward mids and

highs.

56 Revox B261 强劲的低音，非常令人愉悦的但是微微向前倾的中高音。

57: Pioneer TX-9500II - Clean, articulate sound. Lighter sonic presentation

against the L-02T.

57 先锋的TX-9500Ⅱ 干净而清爽的声音表现，相对于建伍的L-02T声音表现较亮。

8: SAE Mark VI - Inoffensive sound, good background music. A

mini-Sequerra.

58 SAE Mark VI(没听过)不讨人嫌的声音，较好背景音乐表现。

59: Denon TU-850 - Good sound, midrange just right, treble sweet, slightly

bass-shy.

59 天龙的TU-850 好声机，恰如其分的中频表现，高音甜美，低频有些放不开。

60: Sansui TU-217 - Good sound when reception is strong.

60 山水TU-217 当接收型号强劲是是部好声机。

61: Kenwood L-01T - Good sound, midrange slightly forward, good bass.

61 建伍的L-01T 好声机，中频稍稍前倾，低音表现好

62: Phase Linear Model 5000 Series Two - Bass-shy, pleasant midrange and

treble.

62 Phase Linear Model 5000 Series Two 低音有点放不开，中高音令人愉悦。

63: Magnum Dynalab FT-11 "OLD" - Good bass, dry midrange, treble OK.

63 密林 FT-11 “老版”，低音好，中频干，高音好!

64: Quad FM4 - Very nice midrange, good resolution, extended treble, rolled

off bass. 64 国都 FM4，非常华丽的中频，很好的解析力，高频延伸好，低频比较收敛。

65: Technics ST-9030 - Inoffensive but bland.

65 松下ST-9030 不讨人嫌，但是缺少激情。

66: Naim NAT 01 - Bass OK, midrange OK, treble sweet.

66 Naim NAT 01，低音OK，中音也OK，高音甜。

67: Luxman T-115 - Good bass, midrange OK, treble slightly forward.

67 力士T-115 高音表现好，中音也不错，高音有些前倾。

68: Nakamichi ST-7 - Muffled bass, forward midrange, highs soft and

inoffensive.

68 中道ST-7 低音有些压抑(蒙)，中频前冲，高频软不讨人嫌。

69: Marantz 2130 - OK bass, midrange and treble forward and "light"

sounding.

69 马兰士2130 低音不错，中频和高频前倾，属亮声机。 70: McIntosh MR 78 - Good bass, slightly

electronic sound.

70 麦景图MR78，低频好，有轻微的电子声。

71: Fanfare FT-1A - Best through the low-output jacks, clean but bright

midrange, lacks bass power.

71 Fanfare FT-1A 通过低输出端子表现最佳，干净但过于明亮的中频，缺乏低频力度。

72: Kenwood KT-7500 - Flat soundstage, better sound can be found. One-note

bass. More boring than unpleasant in a long listening session.

72 建伍的KT-7500 平坦的声场，但可以找到较好的声音表现，单音符低频，在较长时间聆 听后感觉烦躁。

73: Kyocera T-910 - Pleasant sound, but what's that ringing in my ears?

73 京磁 T-910，欢乐的声音表现，但是总有铃声在我耳边萦绕的感觉(我把它翻成肯定 句)

74: SAE 8000 - Not irritating but not involving, either. Too much

background noise.

74 SAE 8000 既不恼人也不喜人，但总是有太多的背景噪音。 75: Kenwood KT-815 - Bass thin, treble

forward. It cries out for a new audio stage.

75 建伍的KT-815 低频太瘦，高频前倾，这突出了新的声场。 76: Denon TU-600 - Good sound, but not

recommended because of reception problems.

76 天龙的TU-600 好声机，由于接收问题而不被人推荐。 Yamaha T-2 Yamaha T-70

dynamic是什么意思

动态转向模式。

动态转向模式是奥迪所使用的转向系统技术称呼，原理上是运用了叠加的原理，使用的结构却与宝马和丰田的系统有着很大区别，其核心部件是一套以谐波齿轮传动机构为核心的电控系统。

奥迪的动态转向系统，就是在驾驶者即使没有掌握上述的高级技巧时，可以主动地作出这些高级动作，在不知不觉间稳定了行车状态。